Thursday, 10 November 2011

Westfield's Broadmarsh bombshell

It’s a bombshell announcement from Australia which will send ripples not just across Nottingham but the whole of the UK retail industry.
Westfield announced overnight that it has sold its controlling stake in the city’s Broadmarsh shopping centre. And it has sold it to the people who own the Victoria Centre.
The £55m deal will see the Australian shopping centre giant’s 75 per cent share in Broadmarsh taken over by Capital Shopping Centres.
The deal has huge implications for the future development of Nottingham city centre, and its status as one of the top retail destinations in the UK
Westfield was about to push the button on the first stages of the £450m redevelopment – one that Nottingham has been waiting for the best part of 20 years.
So why has it backed out when designs have been drawn up and negotiations with a raft of big retail names have reached an advanced stage?
The official line from Australia – and that’s where this announcement has come from, not London – is that it has taken a strategic decision to increase its focus on ‘larger, iconic centres’ like the giant mall it has developed next to the London 2012 Olympics site.
But the fact that it has sold to Capital Shopping Centres raises another question. CSC is also in the advanced stages of a £250m plan to massively increase the size of the Victoria Centre, and the consensus among property experts was that only one of these two schemes could succeed.
So has Westfield decided to cut a deal where it walks away with a premium on the book value and leaves the field in Nottingham open to one developer?
Either way, its decision to abandon Nottingham is hugely controversial. The city has lived with a weary retail relic for years, watching a previous redevelopment plan sink beneath the credit crunch.
After some difficult negotiations with the city council, Westfield then came forward with a new plan which would not only have redeveloped Broadmarsh but also have tidied up the southern gateway to the city centre, dovetailing neatly with plans to turn the railway station into a transport interchange.
So it was not just retail redevelopment, but tangible regeneration.
As I write, there is no statement from Capital Retail to say what their intentions with Broadmarsh are. But the city will be desperate to keep the idea of a southern gateway alive, and it has real concerns about a Victoria Centre extension which appears to tilt the retail centre of gravity away from the city centre and northwards.
There could be some political recrimination from this, too – has the city allowed a major opportunity to slip out of its grasp for a second time?
Let’s hope not. In terms of spend, Nottingham is still the fifth biggest retail destination outside London, and the interest of the likes of Harvey Nichols predates the current Broadmarsh plan.
Capital Shopping Centres hasn’t spent £55m buying out Westfield for nothing: one way or another, a big investment in Nottingham retail is still going to happen.

5 comments:

  1. Richard. I would say this just clarifies things a little. It was always quite unlikely that both developmetns would go ahead as they would have both been cutting their throats offering incentives to the same retailers to take their space. The one that looked dodgy was the Victoria Centre and I guess CSC knew it.

    I'm sure they will now take on the development of Broadmarsh and maybe just spruce up Victoria rather than full on extend it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm sure that's what the city council will be hoping for, John. We now await some clarity from CSC about what their intentions are, but they would appear to be in a very strong position with the council now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, I get the feeling that planning may be a little easier now. Without wanting to preach that it's a stitch up. I wonder whether tesco having their planning rejected for the island site is in any way related to this decision?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're a move ahead of me, there John!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This deal should not be allowed to go ahead. It is anti competitive and cannot be in either the public or retailers interest. Yet another example of deckchair fiddling by Nottingham's 'leaders'

    ReplyDelete